stardis-solver

Solve coupled heat transfers
git clone git://git.meso-star.fr/stardis-solver.git
Log | Files | Refs | README | LICENSE

commit b4bf7d93e2ae833d5b513a7e1b82458cdb8c2a8a
parent f5bee4e17a2167ba0d9428e527a39eb65d3c59b6
Author: Vincent Forest <vincent.forest@meso-star.com>
Date:   Sun, 21 Apr 2024 15:58:03 +0200

Write release notes for version 0.15

Diffstat:
MREADME.md | 108+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 108 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/README.md b/README.md @@ -158,6 +158,114 @@ Edit config.mk as needed, then run: ## Release notes +### Version 0.15 + +#### New conduction algorithm + +Addition of a new algorithm for sampling a potentially unsteady +conductive path based on the Walk on Sphere (WoS) algorithm. Currently, +unlike the previous delta sphere algorithm, the initial condition must +be constant for the solid. Power density is also supported, but unlike +the delta sphere algorithm, it too cannot vary in time and space. In all +cases, the two algorithms coexist and can be selected via a new input +parameter to the resolution functions. By default, the delta sphere +algorithm is used. + +Note that the WoS algorithm is considered unbiased when sampling a +diffuse trajectory in a solid with Dirichlet boundary conditions. Even +if a numerical parameter is used to stop the algorithm when the +trajectory is close to the boundary, this distance can be set to the +machine's accuracy without significant impact on performance. Hence its +unbiased nature in relation to numerical precision. Its coupling with +other boundary or connection conditions behaves as with the delta sphere +algorithm, i.e. the solution tends towards the exact solution when the +delta tends towards 0. + +#### External spherical source + +An external spherical source can be added to the scene. Once defined, it +is considered as a new boundary condition whose contribution is +calculated at the solid/fluid interfaces in the form of an external net +flux. A new interface parameter controls on which solid/fluid interfaces +this external net flux is imposed. By default, when an external source +is defined, its contribution is calculated on all solid/fluid +interfaces. We point out that the radiative properties of the surface +can now vary according to the radiative source, which can now be +internal or external. + +The net external flux is calculated by sampling the radiative paths to +evaluate the direct and diffuse part of the incident flux due to the +external source. We emphasize that Stardis-Solver does not manage +semi-traparent media, but that the external source provides the optional +`diffuse_radiance` parameter which, once defined, corresponds to the +radiance emitted by the external source and diffused at least once into +the environment. In this way, the diffuse part of the flux manages not +only the radiation from the external source that reaches the interface +after one or more reflections, but also the external radiation scattered +in the environment, here simply represented by the `diffuse_radiance` +parameter. + +The external spherical source is defined by its position, radius, power +and diffuse radiance (see above). While the radius is constant, the +position and power are time-dependent, and the diffuse radiance also +depends on the direction along which the sampled trajectory reaches the +environment. + +The external spherical source is fully supported when estimating the +green function. Only the positions of the spherical source must remain +the same between green function estimation and use. + +Finally, as with net imposed fluxes and power densities, this external +source term cannot be used when solving non-linear radiative exchanges +using Picard iterations. + +#### Allow relative temperatures + +Allow to perform calculations relative to a given temperature T. In this +case, the temperatures managed by Stardis would be relative to T and +could therefore be negative, since they would express a deviation from +T. It should be noted that reference temperatures must always be +positive, i.e. expressed in the absolute domain. Finally, we emphasize +that relative calculations only make sense in linear situations, i.e. +negative temperatures are not valid for systems with non-linear +radiative exchanges. + +This is a major break in the API that callers *must* take into account. +Until now, negative temperatures were considered as unknown +temperatures, whereas they are now valid. For example, an interface with +a negative temperature could be considered adiabatic, whereas it is now +a Dirichlet boundary condition. In other words, the same data could +define totally different systems before or after this version. + +The macro `SDIS_TEMPERATURE_NONE` is added to define the unknown +temperature value. The two helper macros `SDIS_TEMPERATURE_IS_KNONW` and +`SDIS_TEMPERATURE_IS_UNKNONW` are also provided to test whether the +temperature is known or not. + +#### Parallelize multiple probe resolutions + +Add `sdis_solve_probe_list` and `sdis_solve_probe_boundary_list` +functions. Unlike their single-probe counterpart, these functions +parallelize the list of probes, rather than parallelizing Monte Carlo +realizations. Calling these functions is therefore more advantageous in +terms of load distribution when the number of probes to be evaluated is +large compared to the cost of calculating a single probe. + +#### Miscellaneous + +- Updated the function profile used to define surface radiative + properties, i.e. surface emissivity and specular fraction. These can + now vary according to the source identifier (internal or external). +- Make the radiative environment programmable. From now on, its API is + the same as that of other resources such as interfaces or media. Its + temperature and reference temperature are retrieved by functions whose + input argument is the direction of the radiative path. +- Add an optional user filter function as input argument to + `sdis_scene_find_closest_point` function. The user can set their own + filter function to manage the candidate points to be closest. This + gives the caller a fine control during the inquiry to access the + geometry and traversal of the accelerating structure. + ### Version 0.14 - The net flux imposed can be combined with other boundary/connection